Posted tagged ‘Partial Birth Abortion’

Planned Parenthood Selling Fetal (Baby) Body Parts Under “Highest Ethical And Legal Standards”!

July 15, 2015

Pro abortion Planned Parenthood is being accused of selling baby body parts by The Center for Medical Progress, an anti abortion group. Abortion is a subject I normally don’t wade into, because most people have their feet firmly planted on one side of the other. The reason both sides are locked into their positions is because each side sees the issue from a different perspective.

The pro life or anti abortion side sees the issue from the perspective of the baby. They see the baby as a life. They see no break in the time line from conception to the death of the person, hopefully in old age. The baby’s right to life trumps the mothers right to…… FYI This is how I see this issue.

The pro choice or pro abortion side sees the issue from the perspective of a womens right to choose what she can do with her body. They see the baby as a fetus, and talk about the fetus becoming viable at some point. The mother’s right to choose what to do with her body trumps the fetus because the fetus isn’t a life.

When neither side can agree on weather the baby is a life or not a life, any logical argument made from one perspective, makes no sense from the other perspective. Because a starting point can’t be agreed upon about the life of the baby, both sides always argue past each other and nothing much gets accomplished. Because of this, I’m not going to go through all the arguments against the pro abortion side.


This is a video of a planned parenthood abortion doctor executive talking about selling fetal organs. Fetal organs is how the pro choice side would say it. Selling baby body parts is how the pro life side would say it. I will show the video but I will also link to this article here so you can get the pro choice perspective and also read planned parenthood defending their actions. This article is where the quote I used in the title of this post came from.

The attitude of the planned parenthood executive in this video is difficult to take from my perspective. I have to keep reminding myself that she thinks, or she has convinced herself to believe, that the fetus is not a life. How she acts as she eats dinner while talking about abortions and fetal / baby organs, makes perfect sense if you don’t think of the baby as a life.


I am going to make some comments about this video. Just remember I see this planned parenthood abortion doctor executive through the perspective of the baby being a life, which is not her perspective.

This individual sickens me to my rot gut core! As she sits there eating her salad, sipping her wine and talking about fetal hearts, lungs and livers, all I could think of was the movie, Silence of The Lambs, when Hannibal Lecter said: “I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti”.

You would think that a majority of people would agree that partial birth abortion and selling fetal organs should not be legal. Unfortunately, because everything is fought politically, this activity will be defended. Abortion has been politicized to mean that you are either for women or against women. Because of this politicization, the pro abortion side can never concede an inch of ground no matter how abhorrent the act.

But just remember this is not abhorrent from the perspective of the pro abortion side. Since the fetus is not a life it’s just like harvesting a crop. If there is a huge backlash because of this video, the pro abortion side should respond to these attacks like their favorite presidential candidate has responded in the past.


Related ArticlePurchasing A Gun vs. Purchasing An Abortion, at

Related ArticleIndividual Liberty Is The Least Contentious Way Of Settling Differences, at









The Media, Slowly Being Dragged Into Covering Abortion Doctor Kermit Gosnell’s Murder Trial.

April 17, 2013
Media landscape

Media landscape (Photo credit: Christopher S. Penn)

Why has the media been dragged kicking and screaming into this story? We’re told that journalists can put their personal biases aside and cover a story right down the middle: but, if they don’t cover a particular story, we won’t be able to discern the truth about the assumptions concerning their biases, or are their biases revealed by the stories they don’t report? Here is a link to a story on the Blaze, which shows a video clip from Glenn Beck’s TV show, about the Dr. Gosnell story. It doesn’t matter what you think of Glenn Beck, the questions and issues he raises about the media, and progressives in general, and late-term abortions in particular,  have to be confronted.

Physicist Werner Heisenberg said, “…separation of the observer from the phenomenon to be observed is no longer possible.” In other words, how you think determines what you see, and when your thinking produces an incorrect perception about reality, it doesn’t change the underlying reality, it only masks it in your mind. At some point you have to change your thinking to fit reality, instead of trying to change reality to fit your thinking.

If the stories the main stream media chooses not to report shows their bias, how can you trust they are not being biased on the stories they choose to report?