Wind And Solar Energy Is Diluted And Intermittent. Which Means Higher Cost

Posted October 26, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Econ. 101, Government and Politics

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Politicians and bureaucrats mask the real cost of producing energy from wind and solar when they;  1) “invest” your tax dollars in wind and solar companies. 2) give tax payer guaranteed loans to these companies. 3) use your tax dollars to subsidize the purchase of this energy.

On the flip side of the coin, they artificially drive up the costs of producing energy from coal, oil, and nuclear through regulations and taxes.

CAN WE RELY ON WIND AND SOLAR ENERGY? by Prager University.

Excerpt from video, “In the entire world there is not one real or proposed independent free standing solar of wind power plant. All of them require backup. And guess what that backup is? Fossil Fuels.”

LOW COST RELIABLE ENERGY FUELS ECONOMIC PROSPERITY.

An economy becomes wealthier when it can produce more while using fewer scarce resources, time, labor and capital. Economies are fueled by energy. If Government continues to force us to use higher cost energy (read here) to power our economy, we are going to be less wealthy and prosperous. The green jobs that are being brought into existence by Government force, aren’t as productive as the jobs that will be lost when the fossil fuel energy sector is forced to shrink. Put another way, these green jobs wouldn’t exist in a free market because the free market always chooses the most productive activities. Less productive activities go away. The cost of these non productive activities will fall on the entrepreneur who made the miscalculation. He will be incentivized to cut his losses sooner rather then later. The incentives in our crony capitalist green energy industry are different. Since the tax payer pays the cost of the failure (read here), the losses will be allowed to go on longer. Resources, time, labor and capital will be wasted as well as tax payer dollars.

When will we quit putting our faith in politicians and bureaucrats when their policies constantly fail to produce their hoped for results. Our current crony capitalist system that weds Government and business isn’t free market capitalism. Our politicians want you to think it’s free market capitalism because they need a straw man to demonize. Once demonized, the only “solution” is more Government intervention. And the outcome of government intervention is the destruction of wealth; because scarce resources are not being allocated to their most productive uses according to consumer demand.

We have to rediscover the truth that moving toward free market capitalism and away from government intervention is the only cure for our economic problems. Free market capitalism has lifted billions of people out of poverty and is the only process that can keep us from stagnating and/or sliding backwards.

Related ArticleUnelected EPA Driving Up The Cost Of Food And Energy, at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleFree Market Fracking Trumps Government Solutions When It Comes To Producing Energy, at austrianaddict.com.

Related VideoThe Story of Electricity, 2 minute video by, instituteforenergyresearch.org.

Must Reads For The Week 10/23/15

Posted October 24, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Must Reads For The Week

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Challenge To The GOP From Bernie Sanders: Put Up Our Shut Up On Capitalism, by Dan Mitchell, at freedomandprosperity.org. Sanders is correct for wanting reporters to ask Republicans: ‘are you a capitalist’. Socialism is government ownership of the means of production. Sanders and Hillary don’t want socialism. They want government intervention, redistribution and crony socialism. Capitalism is private ownership of the means of production. Republicans candidates think they want capitalism. But what they propose is varying degrees of government intervention, redistribution, and crony capitalism. It’s going to take decades of elections to replace politicians who have this mindset with people who understand free markets and liberty. Inch by inch.

Sanders, Trump, and John Maynard Keynes, by Hunter Lewis, mises.org. Sanders thinks our current Keynesian crony capitalist system is capitalism. Trump thinks our current Keynesian crony capitalist system is socialism. Their cure is more government intervention in different ways. Sanders wants redistribution of wealth, and Trump wants a mercantilist attitude about trade.

Donald Trump’s Contempt For The Free Market, at economicpolicyjournal.com. Trump wants to stop Ford from building an auto plant in Mexico by putting a tariff on the goods Ford will bring in from Mexico. Government regulations and taxes incentivized Ford to move the plant. So instead of using more Government force to create different incentives, why not get rid of the regulations and taxes that produced the original incentives?

My Letter To The NY Times re: My Advice To The ECB And The Fed, by Patrick Barron, at patrickbarronblog.blogspot.com. Excerpt from the article. “If the Fed wishes to prevent financial crises, it only needs to stop initiating them. The Fed’s hubris that it can fathom the proper interest rate for our vast and complex economy must rank among the greatest fallacies of all time. The Fed sees the world through the completely discredited Keynesian lens which posits that aggregate demand–what the rest of us know simply as spending–is the path to prosperity. Anyone who believes this nonsense need ask himself why he has not liquidated his own savings on frivolous consumption…

Global Stocks Soar On Surprise China Rate Cut, by David Gaffen, at reuters.com. Is anyone shocked that global stock markets soared when China’s central bank cut interest rates and the European central bank said they will increase the size of its quantitative easing (electronically printing counterfeit money) program? How strong is the world economy when the central banks of China, Europe, and the U.S. have to lower interest rates and print money to keep it afloat?

The Cronies: Half Of All Export-Import Bank Benefits Go To 10 Companies, at economicpolicyjournal.com. The Exim Bank, backed by your tax dollars, finances transactions so foreign customers can buy from American companies. These are transactions that private banks wouldn’t make because of the commercial and political risks inherent in these deals. It’s easier to be risky when it isn’t your money. By the way, does this seem like a money laundering scheme?

A Tax I Can Support, by Per Byland, at mises.org. This just might work. Unfortunately politicians would never pass it.

Justin Trudeau Elected Canada’s Prime Minister; Young Liberal Star Compared To Obama, at mercurynews.com. How could this happen? Were Canadian citizens not aware of what has been going on South of their border over the last seven years? Oh wait! What about this article? Obama Campaign Team Hands Canada Over To Lib-Left, at canacafreepress.com.

Is The New Higher Seattle Minimum Wage Destroying Restaurant Jobs In Seattle? at economicpolicyjournal.com. The answer is yes. Because the law of supply and demand states: Less is demanded at a higher price. This includes labor.

Actors In Los Angeles File Lawsuit Against Actors’ Equity Over Wage Hike, at latimes.com. I guess a minimum wage increase is only cool when it doesn’t affect you.

Michigan Governor Signs Bills Reforming Civil Asset Forfeiture, theoaklandpress.com. Some good news for liberty.

Rhonda Rousey Shuts Down Feminist.

There’s a difference between merit and value. You don’t get payed for how hard you work. You get paid for the value you produce. Who works harder; a man with a shovel digging a ditch, or a man on a backhoe digging a ditch? It doesn’t matter. The real question is; who produces the most value?

 

Ohio Issue 3: A Taxi Cartel For Marijuana! Why Not An Uber Marijuana Market?

Posted October 22, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Government and Politics

Tags: , , , , , ,

Just as Uber is taking transportation into the modern era by breaking up the old government sanctioned taxi cartel system (read- ‘Car Wars’ Return Of The Jitneys: Uber vs. The Taxi Cartel). We in Ohio are about to set up a stone age cartel system for marijuana if issue 3 is passed.  Don’t let anyone tell you that issue 3 legalizes marijuana in the State of Ohio. It does not. It creates a monopoly for 10 specific groups to grow marijuana, while it restricts the amount that everybody else can possess or grow. Here is what Issue 3 says (read ballot issue 3 here).

WHAT ISSUE 3 WILL DO

1) “Create exclusive rights for 10 self-designated landowners (click here for list of owners) to grow, cultivate, and extract marijuana.”

2) “One additional growth facility may be allowed in four years if existing facilities can’t meet consumer demand.”

3) “Allow approximately 1100 retail establishments to sell recreational marijuana if they get a license.” You have to get a license to sell.

4) “Create a special tax rate limited to 15% on gross revenue of the growth facilities…..and a special tax rate limited to 5% on gross revenue of each licensed marijuana retail store.” Don’t you wish you could set your tax rate that can’t be raised?

5) “Create a new state government agency called the marijuana control commission to regulate the industry comprised of seven Ohio residents appointed by the Governor.” Will this board be susceptible to lobbying or bribery?

6) “Limit the ability of the legislature and local governments from regulating the manufacture, sale, distribution, and use of marijuana and marijuana products.” Local governments have no say in any of this.

7) “Allow each person, 21 years of age or older, to grow, cultivate, use, possess, and share up to 8 ounces of usable home-grown marijuana plus 4 flowering marijuana plants if the person holds a valid state license. Allow each person 21 years of age and older, to purchase, possess, transport, use, and share up to 1 ounce of marijuana for recreational use.” You have to have a license to grow your personal plants. The amount you can possess is limited. And you can’t sell any of it you can only share it.

8) “Authorize medical use for a person who has a certified debilitating medical condition.

A MARIJUANA TAXI CARTEL! WHY NOT AN UBER MARKET?

Issue 3 doesn’t legalize marijuana. If it did, there would be no restrictions on the amount each individual could possess for any reason. Issue 3 gives out 10 marijuana medallions to certain individuals to supply marijuana. It excludes everybody else. An Uber market would allow every individual to grow, possess and sell marijuana if they choose.

The 10 cartel owners are either economically ignorant or they are relying on the economic ignorance of the voters when they put in the provision that one additional growth facility can be allowed in four years if existing facilities can’t meet consumer demand.

How is the cartel going to figure out demand? Why would it take 4 years to figure out demand? In a free market, individuals will demand less and supply more at a high price, and will demand more and supply less at a lower price. So in a free market, demand is constantly being discovered, not by any individual or group of individuals, but by every individual making decisions on consumption and production at the present price.

Who sets the price in the cartel marijuana system? The 10 growers will set the price in the cartel system because they don’t have any competition from other potential suppliers who can’t get a marijuana medallion. This is why the taxi cartel prices were so high. Government limited the supply of taxi medallions, which artificially drove up the price of a cab ride. The price was shown to be too high once Uber started supplying rides. These 10 individuals have set up the same type of cartel system that the taxi industry has enjoyed for decades.

WHAT ABOUT ISSUE 2?

Instead of lobbying and paying (bribing) legislators to gain a monopoly position, these 10 groups have decided to use the ballot initiative process of amending the constitution to benefit themselves by restricting access to the marijuana market. It’s crony capitalism through the ballot initiative process.

Issue 2 tries to stop people from using this process to benefit themselves. Here is what issue 2 says (read ballot issue 2 here).

1) “Prohibit any petitioner from using the Ohio constitution to grant a monopoly, oligopoly, or cartel for their exclusive financial benefit or to establish a preferential tax status.”

2) “Prohibit any petitioner from using the Ohio constitution to grant a commercial interest, right, or license that is not available to similarly situated persons or nonpublic entities.

What will issue 2 do? Very simply, the cartel that the people are trying to set up if issue 3 is passed, is prohibited. In other words, you can’t use the Ohio constitution to set up a crony capitalist enterprise. You must do it the old fashioned way, lobbying and bribing politicians.

HOW SHOULD YOU VOTE?

If you are inclined to vote yes on issue 3 because you believe it legalizes marijuana, then you should also vote for issue 2 because it will allow anyone to enter the market for growing marijuana. I think you should vote for issue 2 and against issue 3. Then either lobby the legislators to legalize marijuana, or bring a clean ballot issue in the next election that simply allows individuals to grow, use and sell marijuana. An Uber type marijuana market will spontaneously organize itself, and the out dated cartel system will go away. If you pass issue 3 and not 2, you will be fighting the marijuana cartel at some point in the future just like Uber fights the taxi cartel today.

 

 

 

 

Must Reads For The Week 10/17/15

Posted October 16, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Must Reads For The Week

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Kia is “pushing back on the frontier of ignorance”. Great Job Kia.

Dad fixes sons participation trophy.

Mom has clear vision of reality.

The Disgusting Corruption Of America’s Political Class, by Dan Mitchell, at freedomandprosperity.org. It may be disgusting but is perfectly reasonable when you consider the incentives. As Government increases its power, people will pay politicians to protect themselves from government regulation, or bribe politicians so they will keep competition our.

Fed’s Fisher Says 2015 U.S. Rate Rise ‘An Expectation Not A Commitment, at economicpolicyjournal.com. The Fed has been talking tough about an interest rate hike for the past year but have failed to pull the trigger. This shows how weak they think the U.S. economy is. The interest rate hike always seems to disappear like a mirage in a desert as you walk toward it.

Labor Force Shrinks, The Fed Has No Strategy, by Ryan McMaken, at mises.org. There are 94 million people of working age not in the labor force. This is 15 million fewer people working than were working in 2008. How can an economy be growing or healthy if fewer people are producing? The Feds only answer for a bad economy is to lower interest rates. Where do they go from zero percent? Negative interest rates?

One True Measure Of Stagnation: Not In The Labor Force, by Charles Hugh Smith, at oftwominds.com. This is a slightly different look at labor force participation in the US. Here is an excerpt from the article. “Heroic efforts are being made to cloak the stagnation of the U.S. economy. One of these is to shift the unemployed work force from the negative-sounding ‘jobless’ category to the benign-sounding ‘Not in the Labor Force’ category.”

According To Bernanke, This Was The “Biggest Impact Of QE“, at zerohedge.com. Bernanke said the biggest impact of QE was job creation. I think he needs to look at the work force participation rate chart that is on the Federal Reserve’s own website.

We All Know What Unions Don’t: Their History, by Amy Otto, at thefederalist.com. The Uber economy will make unions more extinct than the dinosaur that they already are.

Would-Be Killers Target Gun-Free Zones, by John Lott, at philly.com. HT libertypenblog.blogspot.com. Gun free zones are dangerous. From the article. “Since at least 1950, all but two public mass shootings in America have taken place where general citizens are banned from carrying guns.

Fortune 500 Firms In 1955 vs. 2015; Only 12% Remain Thanks To The Creative Destruction That Fuels Economic Prosperity, by Mark J. Perry, at carpediemblog. The consumer is the ultimate judge on whether a company remains survives.

 

 

 

 

Milton Friedman Wins The Democrat Debate Against Hillary Clinton And Bernie Sanders

Posted October 15, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Econ. 101, Government and Politics

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The first Democrat debate between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton seemed like a debate between Karl Marx and Fidel Castro. Sanders truly believes that Marxist socialism will work, and Hillary just uses the Marxist rhetoric to win a position of power. The real winner in the debate was Milton Friedman who, in the video below, knocks Bernie and Hillary’s free lunch rhetoric out of the park.

SERFDOM OR FREEDOM

Bernie and Hillary tried to out do each other on what they will give away if elected. But, since Government doesn’t produce anything. It can’t give anything away unless politicians and bureaucrats try one or all of the steps listed below.

1)  They can force the person who produces the good or service to provide it for free.

2) They can confiscate money from citizens (taxes) to pay the people who produce the good or service.

3) If they can’t steal enough, they have to borrow money to pay the people who produce the good or service.

4) If they can’t do #2 or #3, they have to get the Federal reserve to print money to pay the people who produce the good or service.

Our Government has spent a little over a half a trillion (500 billion) dollars more than it has taken in taxes each of the last 3 years. These three years follow a three-year period in which it spent over a trillion more than it took in taxes in each year. So as you can see we have exhausted step 2 and are at full speed on steps 3 and 4.

Since no one will work for nothing when they have other options, step one is difficult to implement. Step two has its limits as revenue will start to decrease if taxes are too high. Step 3 syphons money from capital markets and moves it into consumption activities (which is what government spending is). If Government borrows too much, interest rates will go up, the cost of the debt will increase, and Government will have a hard time selling its debt. At this point step 4 will be implemented. The Federal Reserve will step in and buy U.S. T-Bills with electronically printed counterfeit money. Step four is how the Government can fund itself if 2 and 3 are maxed out.

These steps are not a part of a free society, they happen in a country that is heading toward a centrally planned Marxist society. If the government doesn’t own the means of production out right, it uses its force to control the privately owned means of production. This is where we are, and I think you can see the direction we are headed unless ‘we the people’ turn this around.

Related ArticleMilton Friedman, Moving Toward Serfdom, at austrianaddict.com

Related ArticleMilton Friedman: Market Failure vs. Government Failure. Which Has A Higher Cost? at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleThe Essential HAYEK. at austrianaddict.com.

 

The Gun Debate

Posted October 13, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Government and Politics

Tags: , , , , ,

This video from Reason.com shows the anti-gun crowd the secret on How To Create A Gun-Free America In 5 Easy Steps. I can’t believe Austin Bragg from Reason is helping the gunphobes in their quest to rid us of gun violence.

1) Elect 2/3rds of Congress who agree with you

2) Have them vote a proposed constitutional amendment that repeals the 2nd amendment.

3) Convince 38 State legislatures to ratify your amendment.

4) Have congress pass a law signed by the President that outlaws guns.

5) Have the police, the FBI, and the ATF confiscate 350 million guns from citizens who would probably not be willing to comply with the new law.

The cost of implementing the 5 steps is very high. This is why the anti-gun people will use political means, executive orders, and friendly courts to try to implement there anti-gun ideology.

GUN CONTROL MYTHS

Here is an article titled 7 Gun Control Myths That Just Won’t Die, by Sean Davis, at thefedralist.com. Mr. Davis takes apart some myths that the anti-gun crowd likes to assert when attempting to convince people their side is right. Here are a few myths from the article.

4) CONCEALED CARRIES DON’T PREVENT MASS SHOOTINGS

“Do armed civilians stop mass shooters?” the liberal magazine Mother Jones asked in 2012. “Actually, no.”

“Mother Jones justified its assertion by citing its own analysis that of the 62 mass shootings between 1982 and 2012, not one was stopped by a civilian with a gun. Shocking, right? Not really, once you consider the logical fallacy underlying the Mother Jones claim.”

“The fact of the matter is that shootings that happen in an area where concealed carriers can immediately respond don’t generally become mass shootings. It’s a bit like saying locked doors and alarms don’t prevent burglaries by only citing burglaries that happened in buildings with no locked doors or alarms as proof of your thesis. It’s no coincidence that so many mass shootings happen in areas declared to be “gun-free zones” by authorities.”

“Instances of concealed carriers stopping shooters in their tracks are too numerous to count. Here are just a few examples found from a few seconds of Googling.”

July 27, 2015:

April 20, 2015:

September 22, 2015:

“Concealed carriers can’t be expected to stop every shooting, just as police can’t be expected to prevent all crime. It is a fact, though, that concealed carriers regularly put an end to violent shootings”

5) THE SECOND AMENDMENT ONLY APPLIES TO MUSKETS

“This trope is a popular one among gun control advocates who imagine themselves as strict constructionists when it comes to Constitutional interpretation. Piers Morgan, the failed CNN host and British tabloid editor accused of hacking into celebrity voicemails in search of tabloid gossip, is the foremost advocate of the notion that the Second Amendment protects only the rights of Americans to carry muskets:”

“As Carol Roth noted, the refusal of the Founding Fathers to precisely name the types of arms which citizens have a right to keep and bear was intentional. The same can be said of their refusal to constrain our right of free expression to quill pens and bulky printing presses. The Second Amendment protects our right to own handguns just like the First Amendment protects our right to criticize the government using the Internet.”

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

Politicians on the left will use every crisis to advance their anti-gun ideology, and politicians on the right will defend their pro-gun ideology against the attacks of the anti-gun left.

The one side is attacking a right that each individual has to protect himself. This right was not given by our Government, it predated our Constitutional Republic. Our Constitution puts shackles on our Government, when it comes to Government infringing on the right of each individual to keep and bear arms. Our founders gave individuals this right so they could protect themselves from Government force. Our founders were going to be the people who were in these seats of power. They didn’t trust themselves, why would we trust our present day politicians who are so far removed from our founders understanding of tyranny.

This political dance will continue with no ground being won or conceded by either side. Nothing will happen until the first four steps in the video above are accomplished. Then the s+*# will hit the fan when Government tries to implement step 5.

Related ArticleAnti vs. Pro-Gun Visions Of The World, at austrianaddict.com.

Related Article“You Never Let A Serious Crisis Go To Waste“, at austrianaddict.com.

 

Must Reads For The Week 10/10/15

Posted October 10, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Must Reads For The Week

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

French Workers Attack Air France Executives Rip Off Their Clothes, at economicpolicyjuornal.com. How can businesses survive the costs of the benefits mandated by government? Compensation for working more than 35 hours a week, subsidized travel, restaurant lunch vouchers, paid days off for weddings and funerals, subsidized healthcare, guaranteed maternity and paternity leave, thirteenth month bonus pay, and minimum wage are just a few. Politicians who mandated all these benefits employers have to provide are the ones who caused these layoffs. These protesters are attacking the wrong people, they should be attacking the politicians for losing their jobs. We are not far behind France. Just look at the mandated benefits listed in the article; do they sound familiar?

Politicians Keep Chasing The Green Jobs Fantasy, at freedomandprosperity.com. Green energy is nothing more than a money and power grab. Green energy is not a viable alternative to fossil fuels. It can only become an alternative if its unsubsidized cost per kilowatt-hour is lower than the cost per kilowatt-hour from fossil fuels. Fracking has pushed the green dream farther into the future.

Michigan’s Wind Energy Mandate Costs Each Family $4,000, at michigancapitalconfidential.com. Because of the higher cost 24,000 jobs went away. When will we learn that central planning doesn’t work? Markets don’t necessarily pick winners. Markets allow the winners to be revealed. And it puts pressure on them to continue to please the consumer or another winner will take its place.

Recycling Was ‘Garbage’ In 1996, It’s Still That Way Today, And The Future Looks Even Worse, by Mark J. Perry, at carpediemblog. Recycling is now seen as a moral imperative, when in reality it is a waste of resources, time and money. Quote from John Tierney: “We’re not just reusing our garbage, we’re performing a rite of atonement for the sin of excess.

Adidas 3D Printing Is A Sneaker Industry Game Changer, at esquire.com.

Swash 10-Minute Clothing Care, at swash.com. Swash is like having a dry cleaner at home.

Chile’s Private Social Security System Should Be Globally Emulated, Not Locally Emasculated, by Dan Mitchell, at freedomandprosperity.com. Chili privatized its social security system in the 80’s. Its success speaks for itself. The governments recent drift toward socialism puts the pension money in the cross hairs of the central planners.

Government Planted Questions For ’60 Minutes’ Interview With Snowden, at economicpolicyjournal.com. What about the separation of press and state. Does this surprise anyone?

Two Journalists Banned From Debate On Whether Feminism Stifles Free Speech, at tamybruce.com. The headline says it all.

Why America’s Oil Output Refuses To Collapse, at bloomberg.com. Fracking comes with new ways to extract more oil from existing wells at a lower cost. Cooperation in a market produces better results than top down decision-making from central planners. If President Obama had his way he would have shut down fracking. He is trying to do it through EPA regulations like he crippled the coal industry.

TIME TO LAUGH

Bear Reacts Logically To Mixed Signals Given By Insane Lady

Video starts with insane lady talking to a bear.

Lady: “Thank you for leaving my kayak alone.”

Bear: No response

Lady: “I’m going to pepper spray you in the face, that’s what I’m going to do to you.”

Bear: “You insane b*$@#! Now watch what I do to your kayak.”

Her voice is like finger nails on a chalk board (click here).

 

PICTORIAL ESSAY: 18 Things I Did That My Grand-Kids Can’t Do Without Someone Getting Arrested, at theburningplatform.com.

Here are a few.

Guns!

We played Cops and Robbers! People DIED! We used ketchup as blood to make it look real. We took cap pistols to school …so we could play Cops and Robbers during Recess. I believe that in rural areas kids could even take bb-guns to school. No one gave a rats ass. Ever.

Sensible Punishment

Practically the only way to get expelled was if you actually put someone’s eye out. They didn’t expel kids willy-nilly for every imaginable offense.

Baths Were For Wimps

Even today, at age 81, my mom’s house is so clean you could perform open-heart surgery in any room. After playing outside all day, the chances of me walking in the house were exactly zero. I’d strip to my underwear, and mom would hose me down. She had a big heart though. In the winter time she’d use a warm bucket of water.

CARTOONS

Political Cartoons by Nate Beeler

which-one-of-these-signs-will-prevent-an

Politicize-600-LI.jpg

Ted Cruz And Sierra Club President Spar Over The “Settled Science” Of Global Warming

Posted October 9, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Government and Politics, Miscellaneous

Tags: , , , , ,

Sierra Club President Aaron Mair looks like someone caught in quick sand as he struggles to avoid answering Ted Cruz’s questions about global warming. He repeats over and over again that “97% of the ‘worlds scientists’ concur that global warming is a fact.” I guess he is trying to convince himself because nobody would be convinced by this performance. (I wonder what constitutes “worlds scientists”?). If this was a prize fight they would have stopped it in the second round.

 

Watch this short video from my post titled, What They Haven’t Told You About Climate Change, in which the co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, blows the whistle on the global warming hoax.

Related ArticleGlobal Warming? at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleReligion? Economics? Science? at austrianaddict.com.

Observable Differences Between Cultures

Posted October 7, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Hall of Fame, Miscellaneous

Tags: , , , , ,

 

I attended a basketball coaches clinic last weekend at the Columbus Convention Center. As I was walking down a long hallway toward the clinic, I noticed people carrying orange bags and wearing badges attached to orange lanyards around their neck. These people were attending a Materials Science and Engineering Technology conference that was being held in another hall at the convention center. Being curious, I stopped where these people were registering and found out this conference “brought together scientists, engineers, students, suppliers and more to discuss current research and technical applications, and to shape the future of materials science and engineering technology”.

As I stood there I noticed the people who were attending this conference were different from the people attending the basketball clinic. I walked over to a black gentlemen who worked for the convention center checking badges as people were entering the hall, and started talking to him. He said,  “you’re here for the basketball clinic”. He laughed when I said, “how could you tell”? I asked him, “if I went over and stood in the middle of the people registering for the tech conference, would you be able to pick out the one person who didn’t belong”? He started laughing. I said, “90% of the people are Asian aren’t they”? He said, “yeah, and the rest are from India”. I said, “I bet I won’t see one Asian person at the basketball clinic”.

A coach I went to the clinic with came by and as we walked down the hall to our clinic I told him about the Materials Science and Engineering Technologies conference that was going on at the same time as our clinic. I said, “I want one of those orange bags so people will think I am with the other conference”. He said, “people would probably be wondering who you stole that orange bag from”.

Thomas Sowell

As I read Thomas Sowell’s recent articles ‘Charlatans And Sheep’ (link to articles, and excerpts below), the differences I observed between the people attending the tech conference and the basketball clinic came to mind. I’ve read many of the books about race and culture that Dr. Sowell has written over the years, and here are a few things I’ve learned. 1) Certain races and cultures are better at certain things than other races and cultures. 2) These differences should not be a shock to anyone because group differences have existed through out history. 3) Politicians will exploit peoples ignorance about group differences, and blame one group for preventing the other group from excelling in that particular field.

Reading Thomas Sowell’s books on Race and Culture (click here) gives a person a base of knowledge for understanding why these differences exist. It also allows you to see how politicians, the media, and courts show their ignorance about this subject, and use others ignorance to gain power.

THOMAS SOWELL – CULTURE MATTERS

Here are some excerpts from Dr. Sowell’s three articles titled, Charlatans and Sheep (click here), Charlatans and Sheep Part II (click here), and Charlatans and Sheep Part III (click here).

“Whenever some group is not equally represented in some institution or activity, the automatic response in some quarters is to assume that someone has prevented equality of outcomes.”

“This preconception of equal outcomes requires not one speck of evidence, and defies mountains of evidence to the contrary. Even in activities where individual performances are what determine outcomes, and those performances are easily measured objectively, there is seldom anything resembling equal representation.

“For 12 consecutive years — from 2001 through 2012 — each home run leader in the American League had a Hispanic surname. When two American boys whose ancestors came from India tied for first place in the U.S. National Spelling Bee in 2014, it was the 7th consecutive year in which the U.S. National Spelling Bee was won by an Asian Indian.”

“We all know about the large over-representation of blacks among professional basketball players, and especially among the star players. The best-selling brands of beer in America were created by people of German ancestry, who also created China’s famed Tsingtao beer. Of the 100 top-ranked Marathon runners in the world in 2012, 68 were Kenyans. The list could go on and on. Although blacks are over-represented among professional football players, even the most avid National Football League fan is unlikely to be able to recall seeing even one black player who kicked a punt or a point after touchdown.”

“Among the many reasons for gross disparities in many fields, and at different income levels, is that human beings differ in what they want to do, quite aside from any differences in what they are capable of doing, or what others permit them to do. Observers cannot just grab a statistic and run with it, though that is what they do….”

“….. we constantly hear charlatans loudly proclaiming numerical “gender gaps” in employment or pay, and suing for discrimination.

“One of the secrets of successful magicians on stage is directing the audience’s attention to something that is attractive or distracting, but irrelevant to what is actually being done. That is also the secret of successful political charlatans.”

“Charlatans are only half the story. The other half includes people who are gullible enough to be led around like sheep by those exploiting the prevailing political correctness dispensed in our schools, colleges and the media……..So long as there is widespread gullibility, there will be charlatans ready to exploit it for their own benefit, either politically or financially.”

Related ArticleThomas Sowell: The Economics And Politics Of Race, at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleThomas Sowell: Human Capital More Important Than Physical Capital, at austrianaddict.com.

 

 

 

Specialization And The Division of Labor

Posted October 6, 2015 by austrianaddict
Categories: Econ. 101

Tags: , , , , ,

The video below shows what an individual would have to go through to make a chicken sandwich if there was no division of labor and exchange. This represents a primitive life style that many of us alive today don’t understand because we were born at a time in history that has seeming abundance. But our current standard of living has existed for only a short period of time when you consider the recorded history of the world. The division of labor, specialization, trade, capital formation and accumulation, a medium of exchange {money}, are examples of market phenomena that spontaneously evolved over time. None of these were results of a centrally planned economy. We take these things for granted. In fact we fight against these things at every turn when we vote for more government intervention into the free market, not realizing that government interventions are hampering these very institutions that created our prosperity in the first place.

I liked this video because this is really I Pencil shown from a different perspective. Entrepreneurs specialize in producing the specific goods that go into making a chicken sandwich. Because of specialization and economics of scale, what is needed to produce a chicken sandwich can be purchased from a grocery store at a low price, stored in your kitchen, and used at your convenience. So instead of spending $1500 and six months producing a chicken sandwich, you can make it when you want to at a low price.

Here is I Pencil as explained by Milton Friedman in his Free To Choose series from the early 80’s.

Here is an article titled ‘The Firm And The Division Of Labor‘ by Per Bylund that goes into more detail about the division of labor. Here are some excerpts.

“Ludwig von Mises emphasized the division of labor as social cooperation and argued that every civilized society is based on the prosperity as well as the mutual dependence caused by the division of labor.

“Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk showed how society, at least the parts that choose division of labor instead of barbarism, consistently develop more roundabout and productive production processes that consist of ever more stages and involve (are dependent on) more people. The roundaboutness or “length” of a production process denotes the number of tasks it includes, where each task is continuously more narrowly defined. The alternative to the division of labor is that the baker has a small field out back where he grows and harvests his wheat, has a mill where he grinds it into flour, and a self-built oven to bake the bread. A longer or more indirect production method, which Böhm-Bawerk talks about, amounts to a farmer specializing in the production of wheat, a miller to grind the wheat, and a baker to produce the dough and bake bread in an oven made by someone specializing in oven making.

“Everybody involved in the production of bread (or any other product or service) — directly or indirectly — is dependent on consumers’ valuation of it. If it cannot be produced cheaply enough, nobody in the chain of productive tasks can sell their intermediate products. The whole economy aims to do this single thing: to produce goods that satisfy the needs and wants of consumers.”

Related ArticleWe’re All Born In The Middle Of The Story, at austrianaddict.com.