Political Correctness Produces Pusillanimous People

Posted February 24, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Government and Politics, Miscellaneous

Tags: , , ,

Pusillanimous means exactly what you think it means. Decades of political correctness has produced people who can’t handle anything that challenges their vision of the world, makes them feel uncomfortable, or offends them. What the standard is for these “offenses” isn’t defined. I guess each person is the arbiter of whether he is offended. They don’t know how to compete in the arena of ideas, because they have been protected since birth from anything that makes them feel uncomfortable. People like me have no problem throwing down with someone who wants to challenge our thinking, because we have been battling the Marxist socialist ideas of the political, academic, cultural, and media class ever since we can remember.

Whoever has protected these people from conflict has created emotional cripples. I think the push back against political correctness is just beginning. Trump is popular because of his political incorrectness. We should not be afraid of being politically incorrect. Put another way we should not be afraid of stating the truth.

Here are two videos from Prager University. One shows the insanity of political correctness. The other talks about how I was raised.

A PROGRESSIVES GUIDE TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

STICKS AND STONES

 

Related ArticlePolitical Correctness Produces Petulant People, at austrianaddict.com.

Must Reads For The Week 2/20/16

Posted February 20, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Must Reads For The Week

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Justice Scalia And Constitutional Fidelity, by Andrew Napolitano, at creators.com. Justice Scalia was a great man and jurist. Here are some excerpts from the article: “Justice Scalia was the modern-day progenitor of the idea….of interpreting the Constitution faithful to the plain meaning of its words. He was utterly and unambiguously faithful to this concept……Justice Scalia argued that the Constitution means what it says; it says it is the supreme law of the land; and all American judges have taken a solemn oath to be subject to what it says. It is superior to the jurists who interpret it…..If the text of the constitution is ambiguous, it then becomes the duty of the jurist to ascertain the original public meaning of the words that form the ambiguity……Ascertaining original public meaning often requires the skills of a historian; yet, thanks to James Madison, the historical record is ample….

The rejection of this line of thinking permits jurists to interpret the Constitution in novel and creative or even destructive ways, according to their own ideologies. It permits them to adapt a meaning in the text that they wish had been there to fortify contemporary societal attitudes…..the job of the jurist, he argued, is not to adapt the text of the Constitution to public trends or cultural changes. That is the job of the Congress and the States through legislation.”

“The Court, he said, was just one creature intended to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. The Constitution is the court’s creator. No creature can be greater than its creator. He liked the Court. He loved the Constitution.”

Student Loan Debt Collection, At The End Of A Gun, by Scott Greenfield, at mimesislaw.com. Think twice before going into huge debt for college. Government is creating student loan debt serfs. Government will receive tribute payments for years to come. HT  libertypenblog.blogspot.com.

Occupational Licensing Regulations Stifle Job Creation, at reviewjournal.com. When the cost of doing any activity rises, you will get fewer people doing these activities, (just as increasing the minimum wage decreases the employment of minimum wage workers). I have the solution: The Government should start a student loan type of program for the people who have to acquire Government mandated occupational licenses! HT  libertypenblog.blogspot.com.

Tim Cook Says Apple Will Fight Order To Help Unlock iPhone, by Brian Barrett, at wired.com. Instead of getting an Apple engineer to decrypt the particular iPhone used by the San Beradino terrorists and retrieving the information, the Feds want Apple to give them the skeleton key that will unlock all iPhones, not just the terrorists particular phone. Big Government always wants more and more power over individuals. How long do you think Tim Cook can hold up against the resources and force that the Federal Government will bring down on Apple?

How Government Buys Your Support, by James Bovard, at mises.org. Excerpt from the article, “Politicians and bureaucrats realize that addicting citizens to government handouts is the easiest way to breed mass docility and stretch their power.” Politicians aren’t being charitable when they give out government largess. They are stealing, via taxation, from one group and using it to bribe another group.

Why Negative Interest Rates Will Fail, by Frank Hollenbeck, at mises.org. The Fed wants to incentivize banks to loan out the excess reserves they are holding at Federal Reserve Banks, in the hope of stimulating the economy. Unfortunately there is no one to loan these dollars to.

When Cash Is Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will have Cash, at zerohedge.com. Government wants us to use electronic numbers (money) in our bank accounts instead of actual cash. Easier to control and confiscate electronic money than it is cash.

Check Out This Rare Planetary Alignment Before It’s Gone, electronicproducts.com. Mercury, Venus, Saturn, Mars, and Jupiter will be visible starting tonight (2/20/16) in the predawn all month.

five-planet-alignment-2016-01-21

The State Of Drug Use In America, at huffingtonpost.com. This article shows the drug usage in the US. It shows each states use of  tobacco, alcohol, wine, weed, painkillers, heroin, and meth. It also shows the number of deaths from alcohol and drugs.

 

 

 

 

Must Read “Leftovers”

Posted February 17, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Leftovers

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Three Reasons To Be Worried About The Economy, by Yonathan Amselem at mises.org.1) Electronically printing counterfeit money by the Federal Reserve has created malinvestment that will have to be liquidated at some point. 2) Corporations have taken on large amounts of debt. 3) Government intervention disincentivizes entrepreneurship.

Supreme Court Blocks Obama Carbon Emissions Plan, at tammybruce.com. A 5-4 decision that would be flipped if Obama gets to appoint another  judge to the supreme court.

U.S. Eyes Ways To Toughen Fight Against Domestic Extremists, at reuters.com. There may come a day when anyone who exercises their first amendment right to free speech and peacefully assemble to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, will be considered an anti-government extremist and locked up. That can’t happen here can it?

FBI Eye’s ‘Lone-Wolf’ Terror Attack In Ohio, at wnd.com. No comment necessary!

Liberty’s Greatest Enemy Today, by Gary North, at lewrockell.com. Excerpt from the article: “The legal revolution of administrative law is the greatest single threat to liberty in the world today, and it is firmly locked into the American social and legal order. People unthinkingly accept it. They are unaware of it.

The Truth About Politics, by Lew Rockwell, at mises.org. Government schools, the media, and politicians tell us that the voluntary exchange of the free market is evil and involuntary confiscation and redistribution by government is good. Excerpt from the article: “But who wouldn’t rather take a sales call from Norwegian Cruise Line than an audit demand from the Internal Revenue Service?”

Take Advantage Of This Anti-Political Correctness Moment, by Stella Morabito, at thefederalist.com. Why have we let this politically correct nonsense get this far? Fight back by being as politically incorrect as you can be.

George Carlin: Political Correctness Is Fascism Pretending To Be Manners.

Saw this at targetliberty.com.

50 Questions Determine If You’re A Libertarian, Or A Central Planning Socialist.

Posted February 16, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Government and Politics

Tags: , , , , ,

Man Hand writing Take Our Quiz with black marker on visual screen. Isolated on blue. Business, technology, internet concept. Stock Photo - stock photo

Laurence Vance wrote these 50 questions (click here) to determine if, or to what degree, you are a libertarian or a socialist central planner (statist). Hat Tip to lewrockwell.com.

Answer these questions, to figure out where you stand on the political spectrum.

  1. Who should decide whether you sell one of your kidneys?
  2. Who should decide whether you smoke marijuana?
  3. Who should decide to whom you sell your house?
  4. Who should decide for whom your business bakes a cake?
  5. Who should decide the dress code for customers at your business?
  6. Who should decide the dress code for employees at your business?
  7. Who should decide whether you manufacture crystal meth?
  8. Who should decide whether your business sells alcohol?
  9. Who should decide what kind of plants you have in your house?
  10. Who should decide what kind of wedding you photograph?
  11. Who should decide how much cash you deposit at one time?
  12. Who should decide how many cash withdrawals you make each month?
  13. Who should decide to whom you rent an apartment?
  14. Who should decide whom you pick up in your cab?
  15. Who should decide whether you snort cocaine?
  16. Who should decide whether you make moonshine?
  17. Who should decide against whom and for what reason you discriminate?
  18. Who should decide how much water the toilets flush that you manufacture?
  19. Who should decide whether you open a gambling establishment?
  20. Who should decide whether you gamble for money in your own home?
  21. Who should decide whether you give your kids wine with meals?
  22. Who should decide whether you sell drugs?
  23. Who should decide whether you send your children to school?
  24. Who should decide how much beer you are allowed to brew at home?
  25. Who should decide what size soft drink you drink?
  26. Who should decide at what age your child gets a job?
  27. Who should decide whether you have a smoking section in your restaurant?
  28. Who should decide how many handicapped parking spaces your business has?
  29. Who should decide whether and how you commit suicide?
  30. Who should decide whether your business’s restrooms are handicap accessible?
  31. Who should decide whom you hire and don’t hire?
  32. Who should decide whom you fire and don’t fire?
  33. Who should decide what you pay your employees?
  34. Who should decide what vaccines to give your children?
  35. Who should decide whether you vaccinate your children in the first place?
  36. Who should decide whether you purchase health insurance?
  37. Who should decide whether you smoke crack?
  38. Who should decide whether your store sells beer on Sundays?
  39. Who should decide at what hours your store sells beer on Sundays?
  40. Who should decide whether you exchange sex for money?
  41. Who should decide whether you exchange money for sex?
  42. Who should decide whether your refinery mixes ethanol into its gasoline?
  43. Who should decide whether your business offers health insurance?
  44. Who should decide what kind of gas mileage the cars get that your company manufactures?
  45. Who should decide whether you consume trans fats?
  46. Who should decide to whom you sell a gun?
  47. Who should decide whether you shoot up heroin?
  48. Who should decide what hours your business is open?
  49. Who should decide by how much your business increases its prices during a natural disaster?
  50. Who should decide whether your business is open on Sundays?

WHERE DO YOU STAND?

If you answered, you should decide to all these questions, you are a libertarian. If you answered, the Government should decide all these questions, you are a socialist central planner.  Anywhere in between means 1) you are moving towards a better understanding of what individual liberty in a free society really means, 2) you are moving toward the belief that more of these decisions should be taken out of the hands of individuals and decided with the use of force by government central planners, 3) you are an inconsistent statist or an inconsistent libertarian.

I have a question for libertarians. What is the number of correct answers an individual would have to get for you to accept them as an apprentice libertarian who just needs some mentoring to become a real libertarian? I love my libertarian brothers, but many seem to have a 100% purity test when it comes to accepting a person into their ranks. Isn’t it our job to try to convince the people on the margin of libertarianism to take the next step in their understanding. This would move them off the margin and toward a better understanding, revealing the next marginal group to be persuaded. I wish the libertarians who have a purity test would look back and remember what they were like before they saw the light. The nature of our job is persuasion, and it is a never-ending job. You can’t persuade people on the margin by beating them over the head. That tactic should be used to have fun at the expense of true believers in central planning.

Here is what I wrote about this topic in a post linked to below.

“WHAT DID YOU KNOW AND WHEN DID YOU KNOW IT”

“We have to be very careful about condemning people who we feel are not close enough to our position. You were probably not close enough to your current position, at some point in your past. In 2007 I was nowhere near where I was in 2010, let alone where I am today. We have to keep people moving toward sound economics, and individual liberty. If they are already open to these ideas don’t blow them out of the water because they aren’t  where you are. Keep in mind the intellectual road you’ve traveled, and are still traveling. Look in the rear view mirror to see who is behind you traveling in the same direction on the same road, and realize there are people ahead of you looking at you in their rear view mirror.”

Related ArticleAre You a Republican, a Democrat, or a Libertarian, at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleHow Close To Your Position Is An Acceptable Distance, at austrianaddict.com.

 

Must Reads For The Week 2/13/16

Posted February 13, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Must Reads For The Week

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Economics Explained (In 1 Simple Cartoon), at zerohedge.com. Economics isn’t about what is good or bad. Each of us wants low prices when we are buyers, and higher prices when we are sellers. Prices reveal the subjective values of consumers and producers at any given point in time. Prices change when decisions by individuals change (of course government intervention is factored in by individuals when making their decisions). These price changes coordinate the activity of individuals on the market. So prices are neither good nor bad. They are part of the process that coordinates supply and demand.

 

The Minimum Wage Surged In 6 Cities Last Year. Then This Happened, at zerohedge.com. This is not complicated. When the minimum wage is artificially set above what the market will bear, the number of low wage workers employed decreases.

Welcome To The Recovery: 1 in 7 Americans (45.5 million) Remain On Food Stamps, at zerohedge.com. During the great depression people stood in soup lines to get food. Food stamps are the modern-day soup lines.

Measuring The Global ECONOMIC Temperature, by Mark Thornton, at mises.org. The shrinking demand for oil, even at bargain basement prices, and shrinking demand for shipping world-wide isn’t a good sign.

The Cozy Relationship Between The Treasury And The Fed, by David Howden, at mises.org. The Federal Reserve funds government by purchasing  Treasury bills (debt). The interest the Fed receives from its debt purchases is paid to the U.S. Treasury after the Feds costs are paid for. Not a bad deal for the US Government!

A Surprising Opponent Of The War On Cash, at eonomicpolicyjournal.com. Excerpt from the article: “...politicians and bureaucrats and their crony banksters actually fear and loathe cash because it protects personal and financial privacy of law-abiding citizens and facilitates the preservation of their wealth in the face of mass political surveillance, negative interest rates, bail-ins and other crimes against liberty and property perpetrated by government.”

Want To Deposit Cash At J P Morgan Chase? Be Ready To Show Your ID, at economicpolicyjournal.com. Another example of banks not wanting to deal with cash.

Latest Report From The Frontlines Of The Bankster War On Cash, at economicpolicyjournal.com. Citi-Bank follows J P Morgan in the war on cash.

Mandatory Depression Screening Is A Depressing Thought, by Ron Paul, at lewrockwell.com. If individuals in government can have people diagnosed as being depressed, they can mandate certain things that the particular “depressed” person is not allowed to do as well as what he is allowed to do. Not very comforting, is it?

Lawmakers Accuse Feds Of “Stealth Land Grab” To Stop Arizona Mine Project, by Michael Bashtasch, at libertarianrepublic.com. This is what happens when government gets too big. Federal agencies can make up a law that will stop private citizens from doing what the bureaucrats don’t want them to do. Just another example of tyrannical government

Oklahoma Schools Put Up Signs Warning Of Armed Staff, by Micha Fleck, at thelibertarianrepublic.com. The superintendent didn’t want the school to be a soft target, so some of their staff is armed. The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun!

College Installs “Gender Neutral” Bathrooms But Makes Them Handicapped Inaccessible, at thefederalistpapers.org. It’s always interesting to me to see the order the left lists its protected groups on its scale of values. Apparently some groups are more equal than others. I have a question; what’s the standard used to weigh the handicapped against the transgendered?

Some Cartoons From theburningplatform.com.

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Are Electric Cars Really Green? From Prager University

Posted February 11, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Miscellaneous

Tags: , , , , ,

Green zealots sing the praises of electric cars while failing to tell us the whole story. The reality is electric cars are really coal powered cars. The electricity used to charge the batteries in these cars is produced by power plants fueled by coal.

The video below from Prager University titled, Are Electric Cars Really Green, explains how green isn’t necessarily green. Electric cars emit just as much CO2 as gasoline powered cars.

Electric Cars Waste Energy

Electric cars waste energy compared to cars that run on gasoline. The energy stored in a molecule of gasoline is used directly, with very little loss, when it is ignited in a cars cylinder. The energy stored in a molecule of coal dissipates from the point where it is burned to produce the heat, which boils the water, that creates steam, which turns the turbines, that produces electricity which is transferred through power lines to your house and is eventually used to charge the batteries that move the car. Only ignorant people, or true believers, would us a more expensive less efficient energy source. Government subsidies make this ignorance affordable, at the tax payers expense. Government always picks losers.

Related ArticleElectric Car Sales Crash Into Economic Reality, at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleGreen energy Proving Venture Capitalists Are Smarter Than Government Bureaucrats, at austrianaddict.com.

Toxic Words: by Thomas Sowell

Posted February 10, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Government and Politics

Tags: , , , ,

Thomas Sowell

The Great Dr. Thomas Sowell thinks politicians use the word “entitled”, to hide reality from their unsuspecting voters. In his recent article titled, “Toxic Words” (read here), Dr. Sowell sets the record straight about one of the favorite words used by politicians, “entitlements”.

Here are some excerpts from the article.

During this election year, we are destined to hear many words that are toxic in the way they misrepresent reality and substitute fantasies that can win votes.”

One of these words is “entitlement.” to hear some politicians tell it, we are all entitled to all sorts of things, ranting affordable housing to “a living wage.”

The reality is that the human race is not entitled to anything, not even the food we need to stay alive. If we don’t produce food, we are just going to starve. If we don’t build housing, then we are not going to have housing, “affordable”or otherwise.”

Particular individuals or groups can be given many things, to which politicians say they are “entitled,” only if other people are forced by the government to provide those things to people who don’t need to lift a finger to earn them. All the fancy talk about “entitlement” means simply forcing some people to work to produce things for other people, who have no obligation to work.

 

WE’RE NOT ENTITLED TO HEALTHCARE

I listened to Bernie Sanders speech tonight after his victory in the New Hampshire primary. He said he wants a single payer health care system, among other “entitlements”, that will be provided by Government.

Government can provide healthcare if it mandates that people in the healthcare field provide it (without pay), or healthcare can be paid for out of the money government borrows, prints, or confiscates in taxes.

We know people won’t work for free. We know healthcare costs will rise because government has no profit motive. We know that taxing, borrowing, and printing lead to unsustainable debt. The only thing single payer succeeds at is giving Government more power over each individual. If government can mandate that we must have health insurance, it can mandate how much and what kind of healthcare each of us receives. It can also tell us what we are allowed to eat and what kind of activities we are allowed to engage in. Essentially government will run our lives because we believed politicians when they told us we had a right to healthcare. That is not freedom, that is tyranny.

Related ArticleWhat Comes First Production Or Consumption, at austrianaddict.com.

Related ArticleSay’s Law And The Permanent Recession, at austrianaddict.com.

Must Reads For The Week 2/6/16

Posted February 6, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Must Reads For The Week

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Obama To Propose $10 Dollar A Barrel Tax On Oil, at economicpolicyjournal.com. We can’t win. An increased supply of oil because of fracking, plus a stagnating global demand for oil has brought the price of oil down to around $30. Now this guy wants to increase the cost of oil by $10 dollars a barrel. Do you think this tax will ever be rolled back when the price of oil goes back up?

Texas Adopts New York Values On Fantasy Football, by Tho Bishop, at mises.org. Most people hate big business because they lobby government for favors. I contend that these businesses would have no incentive to lobby for special favors if the government hadn’t usurped the power to regulate these particular businesses. In a true free market these businesses only incentive would be to satisfy customers, not lobby government for protection or favors.

Oops Again? A Key Server Gets Wiped By IRS, by Steve Sherman, at townhall.com. Is it just me or is this becoming a pattern?

The Fed Wants To Test How Banks Would Handle Negative Interest Rates, at economicpolicyjournal.com. The bank of Japan has recently adopted negative interest rates. Would you have ever believed 5 years ago that we would be talking about this. Negative interest rate is a ploy to get individuals to take their cash out of banks and spend it. It’s just another attempt at stimulating the economy by negative incentives. The previous QE stimulation apparently hasn’t worked as the central planners planned.

Was The Ethanol Lobby The Big Loser In Iowa This Year?, by Ryan McMaken, at mises.org. Ted Cruz won in the corn state of Iowa even though he was for phasing out the taxpayer-funded Ethanol subsidies.

Advanced Reactor Nuclear Power Resurgence In The US, by Ronald Bailey, at reason.com. The radical environmentalists should be all in for nuclear energy if they were serious about cutting CO2 emissions.

An Open Letter To Barack Obama About Gender Payback Regulations, by Don J. Boudreaux, at cafehayek.com. The President is using the apples and oranges comparisons between men and women’s pay differences to push for more government regulations. Even though he pays men on his staff more than the women on his staff. When will we ever learn? Read here, Obama Proposes New Rules To Close The Sex Pay Gap Even Though There Is A 16% Sex Pay Gap In His White House, at carpediemblog.

Can Anyone Doubt That Hillary Clinton Failed To Safeguard State Secrets, by Andrew Napolitano, at reason.com. The fact that she used a private server to conduct State department business is a violation of the law. The fact that some of these E-mails were classified just adds to the number of charges that can be brought against her.

School Gives Handicapped Children The In Bathroom, at thefederalistspapers.org. Another example of the politically correct left having a scale of value on who’s important. Handicapped people are ranked below transgendered people. The left will throw previously protected people overboard for newly protected people. Which group will someday over take the transgendered as their most favored group?

Anti-Capitalist Club Desperate For Money To Pay Its Bills, at libertarianrepublic.com. I’m amazed that these anti-capitalists protest the very system that has produced the wealth that has allowed them to protest it. Maybe they will start to realize that there is no free lunch?

A Surprising Opponent Of The War On Cash, at economicpolicyjournal.com. The German Government has joined the war on cash. So has JP Morgan.  JP Morgan Continues The War On Cash, at economicpolicyjournal.com.

Isn’t it Strange? by Walter E. Williams, at jewishworldreview.com. Lets end with the Great Walter E. Williams. Excerpt from the article, “Isn’t it strange that after a bombing, everyone blames the bomber, his upbringing, his environment, his culture but …after a shooting, the problem is the gun?

 

Cartoons from theburningplatform.com. Click here for more.

Political Cartoons by Henry Payne

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

I wish this was true for the Republican leadership establishment. I know it’s true for a vast majority of the grass roots.

Political Cartoons by Nate Beeler

Observations From The Margin

Posted February 4, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Observations From The Margin

Tags: , , , , ,

Observation Tower

Observations About The Results From Iowa

-Every media expert predicted that Trump and Hillary would win. They would have been wrong on both predictions if Hillary hadn’t won six Iowa precincts on a coin flip. Man is she lucky!

-The top 5 on the Republican side, Cruz, Trump, Rubio, Carson, and Paul, garnered 89% of the votes. Three of these became Senators because of support of tea party and liberty groups. The other two are not politicians. All five are outside of the Republican establishment {defined by me as Republicans in positions of power who want to increase the power of government, and think that everything revolves around what happens inside the Washington beltway}. The establishment candidates, Bush, Christie, and Kasich got 7% of the vote. It looks like the grass-roots are fed up with the Republican establishment.

-It’s interesting how the Republican establishment is hinting that Rubio is their guy now that the candidates they pushed, finished completely out of the mix. Are they trying to pressure Rubio into being one of them just because he was a member of the gang of eight? Do they think they can co-opt his candidacy? Would you consider him to the left or to the right of McCain or Romney, the last two republican establishment candidates for president?

-Ted Cruz was unapologetically for phasing out ethanol subsidies while campaigning in Iowa. Iowa is the top corn producing State. The Governor of Iowa told the people of Iowa not to vote for Cruz. Donald Trump came out for ethanol subsidies. Cruz Won. Cruz must have done a great job of explaining why he was against these subsidies to the people of a State whose cash crop is corn!

-Bernie Sanders was essentially tied with Hillary Clinton in Iowa. It is mind blowing to me how 50% of democrat voters support an avowed socialist, and the other 50% support someone who wants to centrally plan the US economy. Socialist Bernie wants the government to own the means of production. Central planner Hillary wants to leave ownership of the means of production in the hands of the private sector, but she gets to regulate every decision, and skim the profits away in taxes. So I guess the only difference is Hillary won’t tell you what she really is.

-Hillary Clinton’s victory speech didn’t sound like a victory speech. She came across as the unhappy vindictive shrew that she really is. She didn’t seem very happy or thankful for her victory.

-Of the people under 30 who voted in the Democratic caucus, 84% voted for socialist Bernie Sanders. Is this proof that our countries education system is nothing more than an indoctrination camp promoting big government?

Thomas Sowell: Random Thoughts

Posted February 2, 2016 by austrianaddict
Categories: Miscellaneous

Tags: , ,

Thomas Sowell

Thomas Sowell’s random thoughts are filled with more substance than most intellectuals specific thoughts. Here are some examples from his most recent Random Thoughts (click here) column.

-“The best New Year’s Resolution I ever made was to stop trying to reason with unreasonable people. That may be especially valuable during an election year.

-“Will this November’s presidential election come down to a choice between a felon and a pied piper?

“The central non sequitur of the political left is that, because America has never lived up to its ideals, it is to be condemned and repudiated. But what society of human beings has ever lived up to all its ideals? Despite all its achievements, America is condemned by the left because it is not exempt from all the sins and failings found in societies around the world.”

“One of the apparently immortal fallacies is the belief that disarming peaceful people reduces violence. That Fallacy underlies both national disarmament and gun control within nations.”

-“Egalitarians never seem to understand that promoting economic equality in theory means promoting resentments and polarization in practice, making everyone worse off.”

-“Some people are surprised at how many young people look favorably on socialism. But socialism is a wonderful sounding idea. Those who have lived through the era of its disasters in the 20th century, or learned about them from history, are likely to see through the appearances to the reality. A young age prevents the former and our dumbed-down education prevents the latter.”

-“Among the common phrases of the past that we seldom hear today is “Non of your business.” Apparently everything is other people’s business these days, including the media’s business and the government’s business.

One of his recent articles titled, The Demand For Villains, is a must read.

 

Related Random Thoughts Articles-at austrianaddict.com.

Random Thoughts by Thomas Sowell.

More Random Thoughts by Thomas Sowell.

-More Random Thoughts by Thomas Sowell.

Random Thoughts by Thomas Sowell.

Thomas Sowell’s Random Thoughts.